Home
Search results “Federal regulation of lobbying act”
Understand Lobbying in 12 Minutes (Part I)
 
05:51
What are lobbyists allowed to do? We explain the rules and regulations about lobbying, like what gifts they can give politicians, what travel they can pay for, and all the different restrictions and exceptions. This is a basic overview, not legal advice. We use the federal system as an example, but different states have slightly different lobbying laws. Find part two of our two part series here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcO6NXWZF1M Click the Subscribe button for new videos as they come out so you can understand the news, be an engaged citizen, and win arguments about today's topics in politics, law, and government. We explain things quickly in a way that's simple and fun. Connect: Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/AnimateEducate/ Google+ - https://plus.google.com/u/0/106533482165882846041
Views: 2738 animateeducate
Interest Groups: Crash Course Government and Politics #42
 
08:13
Today, Craig is going to talk about something you fans out there have been demanding for months - money in politics. Specifically, we're going to talk about special interest groups and their role in the U.S. political system. Special interest groups are groups of individuals that make policy-related appeals to government - like the NRA, AARP, or the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. It's all pretty controversial, as money plays an important role in the policies and people these groups influence, so we'll bring in the clones to argue for and against them. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All attributed images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 428754 CrashCourse
What Is Lobbyist Quizlet?
 
00:45
Someone who tries to persuade legislators vote for bills that the lobbyists favora group of people try actively influence legislation mr. Lowe learn with flashcards, games, and more for free start studying lobbying quiz. Quizlet what is a lobbyist flashcards. Lobbyist flashcards what is a lobbyist chapter 6 interest groups and lobbying quizletap gov 9 terms lobbyists government 2306 quizlet. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools lobbyist. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools start studying lobbying. Lobbyist represent interest groups or faction start studying chapter 6 and lobbying. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools lobbyists. N) a person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of special interest; A member lobby. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools ap us gov lowe learn for free start studying government 2306 chapter 6 interest groups lobbying. Representatives of interest groups who contact lawmakers or other government officials directly to influence their policy making. Most effective on start studying chapter 10 interest groups and lobbying. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools start studying ap government lobbyists. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools christopher lee p 1 mr. Direct interaction with public officials to influence government decisionsattempts policy makers by start studying interest groups and lobbying. Quizlet quizlet 113516569 what is a lobbyist flash cards class "" url? Q webcache. Googleusercontent search. Valeo (1976), the 1974 federal election campaign act, and 2002 bipartisan reform act start studying political science 101 web assignment 'you are a lobbyist'. Lowe ap gov block 4 learn with flashcards, games, and more for free 1946 federal regulation of lobbying act, buckley v. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools direct lobbying. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools start studying lobbyist. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools start studying the role of a lobbyist in politics. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools. What is direct indirect lobbying? Flashcards interest groups and lobbying flashcards ap gov political parties media chapter 10 government lobbyists the role of a lobbyist in politics. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, other study tools start studying interest groups lobbyists.
Views: 18 new sparky
Corruption is Legal in America
 
05:51
Learn more at http://Represent.Us/TheProblem, and go to https://represent.us/TheSolution to see our plan and join the Anti-Corruption Movement. Click on "show more" to view our sources. 1. Gilens and Page, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” Perspective on Politics, 2014. http://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf 2. Washington Post, “Rich People Rule!” 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/04/08/rich-people-rule/ 3. Washington Post, “Once again, U.S. has most expensive, least effective health care system in survey,” 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/06/16/once-again-u-s-has-most-expensive-least-effective-health-care-system-in-survey/ 4. Forbes Opinion, “The tax code is a hopeless complex, economy-suffocating mess,” 2013. http://www.forbes.com/sites/billfrenzel/2013/04/04/the-tax-code-is-a-hopeless-complex-economy-suffocating-mess/ 5. CNN, “Americans pay more for slower Internet,” 2014. http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/31/technology/internet-speeds/ 6. The Hill, “Sanders requests DOD meeting over wasteful spending,” 2015. http://thehill.com/policy/finance/234578-sanders-requests-meeting-with-dod-chief-about-wasteful-spending 7. CBS News, “Wastebook 2014: Government’s questionable spending,” 2014. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/wastebook-2014-sen-coburn-highlights-questionable-wasteful-government-spending/ 8. The Heritage Foundation, Budget Book, 2015. http://www.heritage.org/issues/budget-and-spending/government-waste 9. The Atlantic, “American schools vs. the world: expensive, unequal, bad at math,” 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2013/12/american-schools-vs-the-world-expensive-unequal-bad-at-math/281983/ 10. CNN Opinion, “War on drugs a trillion-dollar failure,” 2012. http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/06/opinion/branson-end-war-on-drugs/ 11. Feeding America, Child Hunger Fact Sheet, 2014. http://www.feedingamerica.org/hunger-in-america/impact-of-hunger/child-hunger/child-hunger-fact-sheet.html 12. New York Times, “Banks’ lobbyists help in drafting financial bills,” 2014. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/banks-lobbyists-help-in-drafting-financial-bills/?_r=1 13. New York Times, “Wall Street seeks to tuck Dodd-Frank changes in budget bill,” 2014 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/wall-street-seeks-to-tuck-dodd-frank-changes-in-budget-bill/ 14. Sunlight Foundation, “Fixed Fortunes: Biggest corporate political interests spend billions, get trillions,” 2014. http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2014/11/17/fixed-fortunes-biggest-corporate-political-interests-spend-billions-get-trillions/ 15. Sunlight Foundation, Fixed Fortunes database, 2015. http://influenceexplorer.com/fixed-fortunes/
Views: 1444255 RepresentUs
State Legislatures and ALEC: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
 
17:18
While midterm coverage is largely focused on the parts of Congress that do very little, vital (and bizarre) midterm elections are going unexamined. State legislators pass a lot of bills, and some of that efficiency is thanks to a group called ALEC that writes legislation for them. It’s as shady as it sounds! Connect with Last Week Tonight online... Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost happens: www.youtube.com/user/LastWeekTonight Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: http://Facebook.com/LastWeekTonight Follow us on Twitter for news about jokes and jokes about news: http://Twitter.com/LastWeekTonight Visit our official site for all that other stuff at once: http://www.hbo.com/lastweektonight
Views: 8864777 LastWeekTonight
Can States Ignore Federal Law?
 
02:42
What Is Fascism? http://testu.be/1TDPrN2 » Subscribe to NowThis World: http://go.nowth.is/World_Subscribe Donald Trump's rhetoric has gotten so xenophobic and crazy that many are wondering if he is secretly a fascist. So is Trump trying to be the US's first fascist president? Learn More: Donald Trump Is a Fascist http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/11/donald_trump_is_a_fascist_it_is_the_political_label_that_best_describes.html "In trying to explain Donald Trump, I looked to George Wallace, who played a similar role in American politics through the 1960s." Donald Trump wants to deport every single illegal immigrant - could he? http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34789502 "US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump wants to deport every illegal immigrant from the United States." What is Fascism? http://orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc "Of all the unanswered questions of our time, perhaps the most important is: 'What is Fascism?'" Music Track Courtesy of APM Music: "Concentration" _________________________ NowThis World is dedicated to bringing you topical explainers about the world around you. Each week we’ll be exploring current stories in international news, by examining the facts, providing historical context, and outlining the key players involved. We’ll also highlight powerful countries, ideologies, influential leaders, and ongoing global conflicts that are shaping the current landscape of the international community across the globe today. More from NowThis: » Tweet @NowThisNews on Twitter: http://go.nowth.is/News_Twitter » Subscribe to NowThis News: http://go.nowth.is/News_Subscribe » Like NowThis World on Facebook: https://go.nowth.is/World_Facebook » Connect with Judah: Follow @judah_robinson on Twitter – Facebook: http://go.nowth.is/LikeJudah » Connect with Versha: Follow @versharma on Twitter – Facebook: http://go.nowth.is/LikeVersha http://www.youtube.com/nowthisworld Special thanks to Jules Suzdaltsev for hosting TestTube! Check Jules out on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jules_su
Views: 164186 NowThis World
This cannabis bill is already sparking up heated debate in Congress
 
02:47
Despite being fully legal locally, cannabis businesses in more than 30 states remain federally illegal and face hurdles in opening bank accounts. Now, the federal government is considering a bill, tentatively titled the Secure And Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act of 2019, to fix the cannabis industry’s banking problems. Experience The Full Story Here: https://cir.ca/2GB0U3R By Natalie Fertig and Adam Fleishman
Views: 402 Circa News
EPA's McCarthy mocks suggestions that Agency violated Anti-Lobbying Act
 
01:04
Speaking to an audience of federal employees at the 2015 GreenGov Symposium, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy mocks suggestions that EPA is violating the federal Anti-Lobbying Act by employing tactics to influence the public to advocate in support of EPA's rules. GINA MCCARTHY: "You know, I was recently criticized for actually doing a tremendous amount of outreach. That's the kind of criticism that I would really welcome. [Laughter] It was very painful for me to read how successful we've been for getting people to comment on our rules. You know. [Laughter] I should learn to stay in that closet that people want me in, but we're not, and I don't think any of you should. I think you have to hold your head up high. You have to talk about what you're doing, why it's creative, why it matters, and do the best we can to do the outreach so that others begin to have ripples of their own. And, it will connect, and it will work." GreenGov Symposium George Washington University June 10, 2015
How Lobbying Works in Government: Jack Abramoff on Law School, Money, Gifts, Travel, Finance (2011)
 
01:25:24
On January 8, 2001, Abramoff left Preston Gates to join the Government Relations division of the Washington, D.C. law firm Greenberg Traurig. About the book: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1936488442/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1936488442&linkCode=as2&tag=tra0c7-20&linkId=cb0a7781b44f5bed11c7fc696a46911e It once described him as "directly involved in the Republican party and conservative movement leadership structures" and "one of the leading fund raisers for the party and its congressional candidates". With the move to Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff took as much as $6 million worth of client business from his old firm, including the Marianas Islands account. At Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff recruited a team of lobbyists known familiarly as "Team Abramoff". The team included many of his former employees from Preston Gates and former senior staffers of members of Congress. Around the time he joined Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff's choice of lobbying clients changed to focus much more on Native American tribes. While Abramoff was a registered lobbyist for 51 clients while working at Preston Gates, with only four being tribes, Abramoff would eventually represent 24 clients for whom he was registered lobbyist at Greenberg Traurig, of which seven were tribes. Former White House Deputy Counsel Timothy Flanigan left his job in December 2002 to work as General Counsel for Corporate and International Law at Tyco International. He immediately hired Abramoff to lobby Congress and the White House on matters relating to Tyco's Bermuda tax-exempt status.[46] Flanigan stated to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Abramoff "bragged" that he could help Tyco avoid tax liability aimed at offshore companies because he "had good relationships with members of Congress".[47] Tyco Inc. claimed in August 2005 that Abramoff had been paid $1.7 million for "astroturfing", or the creation of a fake "grassroots" campaign to oppose proposals to penalize US corporations registered abroad for tax reasons. The work allegedly was never performed, and most of the fee Tyco paid Abramoff to lobby against the legislation was "diverted to entities controlled by Mr. Abramoff". Abramoff's team represented the government of Malaysia, and worked toward improving Malaysian relations with the United States, particularly with trade relations.[48] Abramoff also met with the government of Sudan, offering a plan to deflect criticism from American Christian groups over the regime's alleged role in the Darfur conflict. Abramoff promised to enlist Reed to assist, as well as starting a grassroots campaign to improve the image of Sudan in America. Abramoff maintained four skyboxes at major sports arenas for political entertaining at a cost of over $1 million a year. Abramoff hosted many fundraisers at these skyboxes including events for politicians publicly opposed to gambling, such as John Doolittle.[53] Then Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member and current Chairman Max Baucus returned $18,892 in contributions that his office found to be connected to Abramoff. Included in the returned donations was an estimated $1,892 that was never reported for Baucus' use of Abramoff's skybox at a professional sports arena and concert venue in downtown Washington in 2001.[54] Abramoff also was co-owner of Signatures Restaurant, a high-end Washington establishment which he used to reward friends and associates. His fellow lobbyist Kevin A. Ring treated Justice Department official Robert E. Coughlin to free tickets to the skyboxes and took him out to Signatures multiple times in exchange for favors.[55] The restaurant, once thriving, was closed once investigations closed in on Abramoff. DeLay, Ney and Florida Republican Representative Tom Feeney have each gone on golf trips to Scotland that were apparently arranged or funded by Abramoff. These trips took place in 2000, 2002 and 2003. Ney and Feeney each claimed that their trips were paid for by the National Center for Public Policy Research, but the group denied this. Spokespeople for Ney and Feeney blamed others for filing errors. Ney later pleaded guilty to knowing that Abramoff had paid for the trip. A former top procurement official in the Bush administration, David H. Safavian, has been convicted of lying and obstruction of justice in connection with the Abramoff investigation. Safavian, who traveled to Scotland with Reed and Ney on a golf outing arranged by Abramoff, was accused of concealing from federal investigators information about Abramoff's plans to do business with the General Services Administration at the time of the golf trip — in particular, seeking help finding property for his private religious school, Eshkol Academy, and for one of his tribal clients. Safavian was then GSA chief of staff. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Abramoff
Views: 11102 The Film Archives
Interest groups and lobbying | Political participation | US government and civics | Khan Academy
 
06:29
Interest groups and lobbying. NAACP, US Chamber of Commerce, NRA, AARP, AFL-CIO, AMA. View more lessons or practice this subject at https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-government-and-politics/political-participation/groups-influencing-policymaking/v/interest-groups-and-lobbying?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=desc&utm_campaign=usgovernmentandcivics Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help! Donate or volunteer today! Donate here: https://www.khanacademy.org/donate?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=desc Volunteer here: https://www.khanacademy.org/contribute?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=desc
Views: 14354 Khan Academy
Eleanor Holmes Norton tries to strongarm lobbyist and demands donations
 
02:03
A couple weeks ago, House Member Eleanor Holmes Norton made a fundraising call to a lobbyist. The lobbyist wasn't available, so Holmes Norton left a voicemail. We have been given a copy of that message. The audio is below. ehn_and_pelosi By way of background, with their prospects for November quickly deteriorating, Congressional Democrats are scrambling to assemble the financial resources they hope can stave off their electoral armageddon. Speaker Pelosi and her leadership team are putting a lot of pressure on Democrat members to pony up campaign contributions to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. In the article linked above, Politico noted: In August, Pelosi and other top leaders wrote members, saying, "We need to know your commitment is to maintaining a strong Democratic majority now" and pleading with them to call "to let us know what you are able to do and when." The pressure is especially strong on members from "safe" districts, who need little campaign money of their own to win reelection. The catch, though, is that many of these members haven't amassed vast campaign war-chests, for the simple reason that they haven't needed them. So, they are scrambling to meet their Pelosi-imposed obligations. Holmes Norton is from one such "safe" district--the District of Columbia. In the following voicemail recording, Holmes Norton seeks a campaign contribution from the lobbyist and even mentions that she hadn't previously asked for a donation. Such is the pressure Speaker Pelosi has placed on the members. But, it is the content of Holmes Norton's message that is interesting. (Note: the first few seconds of the recording, where the name of the lobbyist is said by Holmes Norton, have been redacted by the source.) Her message raises many concerns. 1. At the very beginning of the message, Holmes Norton notes that the lobbyist: ha[s] given to other colleagues of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Beyond being a bit heavy-handed, where did she get this information? Such donations are listed in FEC reports, but it is a violation to use that information to solicit campaign donations. 2. More serious, however, is her frequent mention of her seniority and her Chairmanship of a subcommittee. She is attempting to solicit funds based on her past actions taken in her official capacity in Congress. She is implying to the lobbyist that, should he decline to donate, he will be turning down a senior member of Congress who Chairs a subcommittee highly relevant to his "sector". 3. Worse than that, she details her role overseeing a large economic development project in the District, funded by "stimulus" funds. It would appear that either the lobbyist has an interest in this project, or the Congresswoman thinks he does, as she states she is "frankly surprised" the lobbyist hasn't given to her. Especially, she notes, because of her long and deep work ...in fact it has been by major work on the committee and subcommittee it's been essentially in your sector "In your sector." This raises additional concerns, and we note potentially relevant laws here: She who promises, directly or indirectly, any government contract or other government benefit (provided for or made possible by any Act of Congress) as a reward for a political contribution shall be guilty of a misdemeanor (18 U.S.C. § 600). She who attempts to cause anyone to make a political contribution by denying or threatening to deny any government payment or other government benefit (provided for or made possible, in whole or in part, by any Act of Congress) shall be guilty of a misdemeanor (18 U.S.C. § 601). Then there are the House Ethics rules, according to House Ethics Manual (2008 Edition): p. 147: "[N]o solicitation of a campaign or political contribution may be linked to an action taken or to be taken by a Member ... in his or her official capacity. ... The Standards Committee has long advised Members ... that they should always exercise caution to avoid even the appearance that solicitations of campaign contributions are connected in any way with an action taken or to be taken in their official capacity. ... [A] Member should not sponsor or participate in any solicitation that offers donors any special access to the Member in the Member's official capacity." p. 150: "[A] Member may not accept any contribution that is linked with an action that the Member has taken or is being asked to take. A corollary of these rules is that Members ... are not to take or withhold any official action on the basis of the campaign contributions or support of the involved individuals .... Members ... are likewise prohibited from threatening punitive action on the basis of such considerations." 4. We don't know from where she made this call, but it is a relevant inquiry. It is, after all, illegal to solicit campaign funds on federal property.
Views: 61572 xxxxxxxxpimptaddyone
The Threat to State Regulated Sports Betting
 
05:00
It's our last show of the year! We look at the threat to state regulated sports betting that's coming from a new bill by Utah Senator Orrin Hatch. Mr. Hatch was one of the original authors of PASPA, and he wants the American government to have federal oversight of all state sports betting activity. Links to gambling news stories, games reviews and special offers below. ⭐️ This Week's Special Offer from Wicked Bet: http://online.casinocity.com/casinos/wickedbet-casino/ 🔵 Planet Fortune Online Slot: https://youtu.be/CANCik97bmY ⚫️ Federal Sports Betting Oversight: https://www.thisweekingambling.com/state-sports-betting-regulation-jeopardy/ ⚫️ MLB Sports Betting Deal: https://www.thisweekingambling.com/major-league-baseball-sports-betting/ ⚫️ MLB to Las Vegas: https://www.thisweekingambling.com/major-league-baseball-las-vegas/ 🔴 Visit Our Website: http://www.thisweekingambling.com/ 🔴 Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thisweekingambling 🔴 Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThisWeekInGambling/ 🔴 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/twigfeed ✴️ State Sports Betting Regulation in Jeopardy ✴️ State sports betting regulation in America could be in jeopardy if plans for federal oversight are implemented from a Congressional draft bill. That leaked legislation would require states to have have their betting regulation approved by the US Attorney General and the purchase official major league data under The comprehensive legislation would force states to apply for approval from the Attorney General when implementing new sports betting laws and regulations. However it does not specify if this would be required retrospectively for those states where betting is already legal and regulated. In a nod to the sports leagues and those lobbying for integrity fees, all operators would be required to use official league data until at least 2023. A National Sports Wagering Clearinghouse would be founded to monitor for any unusual betting patterns, while the Sports Bribery Act of 1964 would be strengthened by criminalizing the act of betting based on non-public information.
Views: 1622 This Week in Gambling
Elizabeth Warren Takes On Lobbyists With New Anti-Corruption Bill
 
04:33
Senator Elizabeth Warren is proving that she is serious about rooting out corruption in DC with the introduction of her new Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Act. This legislation is designed to permanently close the revolving door between Congress and lobbyists and reduce the amount of power that corporate special interests wield in DC. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.   Link – https://thinkprogress.org/elizabeth-warren-anti-corruption-public-integrity-plan-to-fix-the-lobbying-industry-c49c57ca2c82/ Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content! Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire Be sociable! Follow us on: Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/ Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com Yesterday during a speech at the National Press Club, Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren unveiled her Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Act. The goal of this bill that Elizabeth Warren has written is to basically close the revolving door, shut it down forever, between members of Congress and lobbyists in Washington, D.C. It would institute a lifetime ban on anyone who has served in Congress to ever become a lobbyist in any way, shape, or form after leaving office, and that's just a small part of what this legislation would actually do. What it's trying to do overall, without getting into too many of the specific minute details of it, it's trying to get rid of the corrupting influence that corporate money has on our politics in a different way than say, getting rid of Citizens United, which is still something obviously many members of Congress want to happen. Most American citizens, Republican and Democrat alike, want that to happen, but that's an issue that's going to be a little bit tougher. Elizabeth Warren, right now, is working on the other route, and that is the lobbyists. Right now, lobbyists are spending hundreds of millions, if not more than that, every single year to influence members of Congress, without having to donate directly to their campaigns. We have half a billion dollars, a little more than half a billion dollars, that has come from lobbyists, or paid for lobbyists, from foreign governments to influence our policies here in the United States just in the last 12 months, half a billion of foreigners, foreign governments, influencing our government to benefit them that has nothing to do with any of us here. Elizabeth Warren would shut that part down 100%. No more foreign governments or foreign officials coming and lobbying our federal government, and that is absolutely what we need. Here are a few of the specifics. I do want to mention this stuff, and this is as ThinkProgress lays it out. It would end the corporate capture of rulemakers and regulators, tighten ethics restrictions on federal judges and elected officials so as to prevent bribes and gifts from influencing their decisions in the practice of stock trading among members of Congress beyond conflict-free investments like mutual funds, definitely something that needs to happen, especially in the wake of Chris Collins being indicted for insider trading, create new transparency regime that would bring the financial and tax histories of elected officials into the light, as well as closing loopholes to open records laws that currently allow influence peddlers to obscure their dealings. ThinkProgress, there's a link in the description of this video, has a great kind of layout of everything that this piece of legislation would do, but the bottom line is this. Elizabeth Warren is out there. She's fighting back against corruption. She is fighting back against corporate power, and there are not enough people out there like her right now doing this. We have a lot of people talking a big game, but so far when it comes to putting pen to paper and writing legislation, we've got Elizabeth Warren, we've got a Bernie Sanders, but what else?
Views: 9390 The Ring of Fire
Senate moves to legalise lobbying in Nigeria
 
06:47
The Senate on Wednesday began moves to legalise lobbying in Nigeria as it passed for second reading, a Bill seeking for law to register and regulate lobbying as a profession. The “Bill for an Act for the Regulation and Registration of Lobbyists in Nigeria and for other matters connected therewith, 2016’’ is sponsored by Dino Melaye, (APC, Kogi West). While presenting his lead debate, Mr. Melaye argued that the National Assembly needed to recognise and approve professional lobbyists in the legislature. He added that the Bill would also make provision for intending lobbyist to be duly registered under the Company and Allied and Matters Act. Mr. Melaye said that the lobbyist after being registered with Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) would also have to register with the Ministry of Justice to practice as lobbyist in the Senate or House of Representatives. He defined lobbying as an activity in which special interests hire well-connected professional advocates, often lawyers, to argue for specific legislation in parliament. He said that although the bill looked controversial and perceived as negative, lobbying took place at every level of government. “The bill will create stricter registration requirement for lobbyists and also require lobbyists to disclose how much they make and spend on lobbying. “It will ban lobbyist from paying for gifts and food as a means of inducement and it would give oversight agencies more powers to investigate violation of ethics laws,” he said. The lawmaker added that the Bill will also offer the legislator opportunity to be more informed about a bill before it comes for reading. According to him, the lobbyists will be readily available to inform the legislators of the idea behind the Bill being pushed. Many senators, including Ben Bruce, Godswill Akpabio, and Mohammed Ali Ndume, who spoke, supported the Bill. They argued that when passed, the Bill would help legislators to sponsor individual bills. The senate referred the Bill to its Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, with a directive to report back in three weeks.
Views: 675 Oak TV
Why Nigeria needs to legalize lobbying ― Sen. Ben Murray-Bruce
 
03:32
The Senate on Wednesday began the moves to legalize lobbying in the country with a bill tagged, "an Act for the regulation and registration of lobbyists in Nigeria". The bill sponsored by Senator Dino Melaye (APC, Kogi West) today scaled through second reading and it has been referred to the Committee of Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters for further legislative actions. Leading debate on the bill, Melaye said the bill seeks to make provision for registration and regulation of professional lobbyists in the Legislature. “It makes a provision for the intending lobbyist to be duly registered under the Company and Allied / Matters Act to be able to carry out the business and as such register with the Ministry of Justice to practice as lobbyist in the Senate or House of Representatives or both Houses," he said. Defining lobbyist, Melaye said, "It is an activity in which special interests hire well-connected professional advocates, often lawyers, to argue for specific legislation in parliament". “lt is a highly controversial phenomenon, often seen in a negative light by journalists and the public. Lobbying takes place at every level of government, including Federal, State and Local Governments, "he said. Contributing to the debate, Minority Leader, Senator Godswill Akpabio cautioned his colleagues against legislating for corruption. "Until we see who will pay the lobbyists, it will be as if we are legislating for corruption. In view of the fact that it is going to be a profession, I hereby support it so that we can all retire to be lobbyists, "he said. In his remarks, the Senate President, Bukola Saraki said the bill when passed to law would strengthen the country's democracy.
Views: 984 Oak TV
Michigan becomes first state in Midwest to allow recreational pot
 
03:28
In a new law that took effect Thursday, Michigan is now the first Midwestern state to legally allow recreational marijuana. It’s the 10th state to legalize recreational pot. But some oppose the high possession limit, allowing people to carry up to 2.5 ounces. Nikki Battiste reports. Subscribe to the "CBS This Morning" Channel HERE: http://bit.ly/1Q0v2hE Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: http://bit.ly/1T88yAR Watch the latest installment of "Note to Self," only on "CBS This Morning," HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Sh8XlB Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: http://bit.ly/1Q7NGnY Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: http://on.fb.me/1LhtdvI Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: http://bit.ly/1Xj5W3p Follow "CBS This Morning" on Google+ HERE: http://bit.ly/1SIM4I8 Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B Delivered by Norah O’Donnell and Gayle King, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
Views: 71280 CBS This Morning
Why legalizing marijuana is stuck in legal limbo
 
02:29
Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act in 1970. More than a quarter century later, a section of that law helped states to legalize marijuana.
Views: 65705 CNN
10 reasons why Senate considers legalizing lobbying in Nigeria
 
03:33
The Senate on Wednesday began the moves to legalize lobbying in the country with a bill tagged, "an Act for the regulation and registration of lobbyists in Nigeria". The bill sponsored by Senator Dino Melaye (APC, Kogi West) today scaled through second reading and it has been referred to the Committee of Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters for further legislative actions. Leading debate on the bill, Melaye said the bill seeks to make provision for registration and regulation of professional lobbyists in the Legislature. “It makes a provision for the intending lobbyist to be duly registered under the Company and Allied / Matters Act to be able to carry out the business and as such register with the Ministry of Justice to practice as lobbyist in the Senate or House of Representatives or both Houses," he said. Defining lobbyist, Melaye said, "It is an activity in which special interests hire well-connected professional advocates, often lawyers, to argue for specific legislation in parliament". “lt is a highly controversial phenomenon, often seen in a negative light by journalists and the public. Lobbying takes place at every level of government, including Federal, State and Local Governments, "he said. Contributing to the debate, Minority Leader, Senator Godswill Akpabio cautioned his colleagues against legislating for corruption. "Until we see who will pay the lobbyists, it will be as if we are legislating for corruption. In view of the fact that it is going to be a profession, I hereby support it so that we can all retire to be lobbyists, "he said. In his remarks, the Senate President, Bukola Saraki said the bill when passed to law would strengthen the country's democracy.
Views: 414 Oak TV
Iain Anderson, APPC Chairman, discusses lobbying regulation on the BBC
 
08:58
The Association of Professional Political Consultant's Chairman Iain Anderson discusses the Google tax settlement and the Government's lobbying register on the BBC's Daily Politics
Views: 241 ollykendall1
Jen Briney | Legislation 2017: Corporatization, Backdoor Deals, Data, & DNA
 
01:17:38
Join host, Greg Carlwood, of The Higherside Chats podcast as he talks legislation 2017 with returning guest, Jen Briney. While we can all recognize that the scales have continued tipping in favor of powerful politicians, criminal corporations and the aristocratic elites, many of us avoid getting into the gritty details of these closed door deals, because frankly, it can be a confusing maze of information. From congressional hearings to corporate lobbying, keeping tabs on what the Washington machine is up to is more than a full-time job. Fortunately, today's returning guest, Jen Briney, has dug deep into the inner workings on Congress. Pouring over every piece of major legislation written in the five years since beginning her podcast, "Congressional Dish", Briney has undertaken a task not many are up to and today she joins The Higherside to fill us in on what the fuck our government is doing. Become a Plus Member at www.TheHighersideChatsPlus.com/subscribe to hear a second hour of all THC episodes. This week's included: - Puerto Rico coverage and disaster relief - tracking the tug of war over healthcare this year and where we now stand - the Democrats' obsession with making a Russian scandal stick instead of running the country - changes to Veteran treatment and programs - Impeachment: is it all hot air, or are the wheels in motion? - the government funding bill, scheduled for Dec 22nd - the weed issue, and the clauses keeping Jeff Sessions at bay, also subject to change in the latest government funding bill A few valuable resources from the interview: Jen Briney on The Higherside Chats "The Corporate Control of Congress, The Federal Budget, & Privatization Propaganda": https://www.thehighersidechats.com/jen-briney-the-corporate-control-of-congress-the-federal-budget-privatization-propaganda/ Jen Briney on The Higherside Chats "Our Corrupt Congress, The WTO, & The Push For Global Corporate Takeover": https://www.thehighersidechats.com/jen-briney-podcast-interview/ H.R. 510- Rapid DNA Act of 2017: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/510 Congressional Dish 148 "Trump's First Laws": https://congressionaldish.com/cd148-trumps-first-laws/#more-2198 Congressional Dish 163 "Net Neutrality": https://congressionaldish.com/net-neutrality/ "All 50 states vote yes on AT&T's $40 billion emergency response network FirstNet": https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/29/all-50-states-vote-yes-on-atts-40-billion-emergency-response-network-firstnet/ Congressional Dish 160 "Equifax Breach": https://congressionaldish.com/cd160-equifax-breach/ Tracking Federal Government: https://www.govtrack.us/ Tracking Your State Government: https://www.billtrack50.com/ Tracking Your Representative: https://www.opensecrets.org/ Want more Jennifer Briney? Check out her website where you can find her poodcast "Congressional Dish": https://congressionaldish.com/ Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/JenBriney Want to hear more THC? Become a plus member and gain access to the additional hour as well as the THC forums at: http://www.thehighersidechatsplus.com/subscribe/ If you want to stay connected to The Higherside Chats, join us on social media: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheHighersideChatsPodcast/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HighersideChats Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheHighersideChats/ Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/highersidechats/ Review us on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/podcast/id419458838?mt And be sure to check out The Higherside Clothing: https://thehighersideclothing.com
Views: 8549 TheHighersideChats
Will Trump make pot part of his 2020 platform?
 
03:07
Canndescent CEO Adrian Sedlin on the political debate over medical and recreational marijuana.
Views: 16560 Fox Business
Congressional Committees: Crash Course Government and Politics #7
 
08:28
This week Craig Benzine clears up the role of committees in Congress. We’ll talk about standing committees, joint committees, conference committees, and caucuses (and not the candidate-choosing kinds) as well as the staff agencies that help advise these committees and congresspeople. As most bills never even make it to the house and senate floors for a vote, the role of committees, and their respective chairpersons as gatekeeper is pretty important. There’s a lot to demystify here as the legislative process can seem pretty arcane at times, but the model, at least in theory, helps Congress run more efficiently. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Instagram - http://instagram.com/thecrashcourse
Views: 728419 CrashCourse
EPA Goes Full Steam Ahead Toward Human Annihilation
 
09:50
JOIN THE HOME OF PROGRESSIVES: https://go.tyt.com/ct3UV4oucKw The EPA is lifting limits on greenhouse gas. Cenk Uygur and John Iadarola, hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. Read more here: https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/12/6/18127399/trump-coal-epa-carbon-capture "The Environmental Protection Agency, now led by Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist, has announced more rollbacks regulations on coal-fired power plants. It’s a striking move for two big reasons: No new coal plants are being built in the US, and the EPA itself (along with 12 other federal agencies) recently put out a sweeping report detailing the need to reduce emissions from fossil fuels because of the grave threat of climate change. The agency is loosening Obama-era restrictions on how much carbon dioxide new coal power plants can emit. Known as the New Source Performance Standards, a provision under the Clean Air Act, the rule established in 2015 said coal plants couldn’t emit more than 1,400 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt-hour." Hosts: Cenk Uygur, John Iadarola Cast: Cenk Uygur, John Iadarola *** The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET. http://tyt.com/live Subscribe to The Young Turks on YouTube: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=theyoungturks TYT on Facebook: http://facebook.com/theyoungturks TYT on Twitter: http://twitter.com/theyoungturks TYT on Instagram: http://instagram.com/theyoungturks Merch: http://www.shoptyt.com Donate to TYT https://patreon.com/tytnetwork http://tyt.com/donate Download audio and video of the full two-hour show on-demand + the members-only postgame show by becoming a member at http://tyt.com/join/. Your membership supports the day to day operations and is vital for our continued success and growth. Gift membership: http://tyt.com/gift Producer, Senior Producer and Executive Producer membership: http://go.tyt.com/producer Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution, movement, or political party. 2. A young person who rebels against authority or societal expectations.(American Heritage Dictionary) #TYT #TheYoungTurks #TYTnetwork
Views: 38147 The Young Turks
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Oral Arguments
 
01:33:22
September 9, 2009: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), the constitutional law case dealing with the regulation of campaign spending by organizations. The United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by a nonprofit corporation. The principles articulated by the Supreme Court in the case have also been extended to for-profit corporations, labor unions and other associations. In the case, the conservative lobbying group Citizens United wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton and to advertise the film during television broadcasts in apparent violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (commonly known as the McCain–Feingold Act or "BCRA"). Section 203 of BCRA defined an "electioneering communication" as a broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that mentioned a candidate within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary, and prohibited such expenditures by corporations and unions. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that §203 of BCRA applied and prohibited Citizens United from advertising the film Hillary: The Movie in broadcasts or paying to have it shown on television within 30 days of the 2008 Democratic primaries. The Supreme Court reversed this decision, striking down those provisions of BCRA that prohibited corporations (including nonprofit corporations) and unions from making independent expenditures and "electioneering communications". The majority decision overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and partially overruled McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003). The Court, however, upheld requirements for public disclosure by sponsors of advertisements (BCRA §201 and §311). The case did not involve the federal ban on direct contributions from corporations or unions to candidate campaigns or political parties, which remain illegal in races for federal office.
Views: 8618 LR
Lobbying
 
15:47
Lobby- advocate some sort of a position to government, say what’s on your mind or say what you want. Lobbyist- articulate basically any sort of interest in swing of American pluralism. Seen as negative when we talk about from the popular press, but they take a huge amount/variety of information about what the constituents one of the people they want they represent one and they translate that stuff those desires, those interests to politicians in a way that they can understand. They do that not just through semantics but it’s also the fact that lobbyist have access. Contact Lobbying- interacting directly with government officials or staff in a variety of meetings, telephone calls, emails. -Background Lobbying- indirect lobbying. When you’re trying to build friendly relations with law makers, their officials or their staff. Grassroots Lobbying- Getting the public to support some sort of position or interest. Lobbyists are regulated at the federal level. It’s not the best, there’s a lobbying disclosure act, the House and Senate of course enacted rules to prevent the appearance of impropriety and they’ve made a criminal act for public officials to ask or receive any sort of a gift or gratuities tied to an official act. Bribery- is not allowed for there to be any sort implied quid pro quo or something for something. So, if you just wanted to give a gift to a center just because you think they’re great that’s very different than giving a gift to a center in exchange for passing a specific piece of legislation if you were to give a gift or any sort of gratuity or financial sum to your favorite politician, that would be bribery. But if it was just a gift with no strings attached, then it’s not necessarily bribery. Sometimes it can be hard to distinguish between what is making good relations with politician and actually giving them something in exchange for something else. -There have been a lot of discussions about the appearance impropriety in elections and it started with the election of Teddy Roosevelt in 1904. However, its opponent Alton Parker had pointed out that Teddy took in large cash contributions from corporations to finance his campaign. -1907 our friends in the Progressive Party helped to pass the Tilden Act which made it a crime for banks and corporations to give funds directly to candidates in federal elections and that’s still applicable today. Federal election- any election for president, vice president, senator, or representative. It’s very different from mayor government, governor, or state assembly person. -Spirit of the Tilden Act became violated because it does not limit individual contributions, so wealthy donors were able to get around the limits on contributions from corporations -Congress began to add more to the body of election law so that none of the measures limit the influence of what continued to be the main source of campaign funding corporations. -Corporations always find a way around campaign contribution restrictions and this became even more evident with Nixon Pat’s in the federal election campaign act aka as fika in 1971 which made disclosure rules and requirements a little bit tighter are a little bit more rigorous when it came to campaign contributions and expenditures. -Because of Watergate, Congress extensively added Fika in 1974 and what they tried to do was limit corporate influence Political Action Committees- carry company’s name it’s designed to make campaign contributions. However, PAC get their money from contributions by employees. Money of the PAC is given to candidates based on decision by PAC officers who have to be employees of corporation. Soft Money- money that is unregulated and that’s as the source or amount under federal election law Hard Money- Money raised and spent under strict contribution limits in federal election law. -Corporations are barred from directly contributing to campaigns, but the Federal Election Committee open the door to give an unlimited amount of soft money contribution to national party committees -1996 Supreme Court also held soft money could be used for issue advertising. There has been a lot of reform starting in the early 2000s -Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act- national parties were prohibited from raising or spending soft money. Corporations can still give an unlimited amount of soft money to advocacy groups for electioneering activity without any restrictions. -We typically think lobbying in some sort of negative light but you also have to think of the fact that lobbying is a form of free speech. If we restrict lobbying, then we’re restricting free speech. -Which is more important: restricting free speech to avoid the appearance of impropriety or having the appearance of corruption free elections.
Views: 226 Dr. D University
Rebecca Gordon Attorney Profile - Perkins Coie
 
01:40
Rebecca Gordon counsels corporations, trade associations, lobbying firms, and other entities on the entire spectrum of legal issues that impact their interactions with federal and state government. These include federal Lobbying Disclosure Act registration and reporting requirements, state lobbying laws, federal and state campaign finance laws, federal and state laws governing conveyance of gifts to public officials, and federal and state pay-to-play laws. Working with clients’ legal and government relations teams, she helps construct and implement compliance programs fitting each organization's structure and culture. She counsels on campaign finance and congressional ethics matters, and helps organizations that wish to do so to create and operate their own PACs. Rebecca's clients include Fortune 100 corporations, nationwide trade associations, and prominent lobbying firms.
Views: 181 Perkins Coie
Scott Pruitt Kept Secret Calendar To Hide His Meetings With Industries & Lobbyists
 
04:34
*The video was early access for Patreon members, and recorded before Scott Pruitt's resignation. To become an early access patron, visit our Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has committed multiple felonies according to a whistleblower who worked for Pruitt at the EPA. Pruitt allegedly kept a secret calendar in order to hide the fact that he was meeting with officials from industries he is supposed to regulate, as well as to hide meetings with lobbyists from these industries. Pruitt’s activities have gone from comical to criminal, and the man should be prosecuted immediately. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.   Link – https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/02/politics/scott-pruitt-whistleblower-secret-calendar/index.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twCNN&utm_term=image&utm_content=2018-07-03T00%3A56%3A48 Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content! Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/theringoffire Be sociable! Follow us on: Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RingofFireRadio Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RingofFireRadio Google+: http://plus.google.com/118415831573195648557 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ringoffirenetwork/ Follow more of our stories at http://www.TROFIRE.com Subscribe to our podcast: http://www.ROFPodcast.com According to a new report, a whistleblower, a former employee with the environmental protection agency who worked for Scott Pruitt, Mr. Pruitt has routinely been committing felonies while in his role as administrator of the EPA. Specifically, the felonies that Scott Pruitt is committing are violations of the Federal Records Act, and he's doing that by actually having his staffers create a second dummy calendar for the public and then a private calendar that actually has the real meetings that he is going to attend, and those meetings include gatherings with lobbyists from fossil fuel companies, they include meeting with executives from fossil fuel and chemical companies, and meeting with the lawyers for these industries and the lobbyists. These are meetings that Scott Pruitt, according to the whistleblower here, kept off of the official books, which Scott Pruitt's schedule, his calendar of events, is posted on the EPA website, but he didn't post these. He hid them on a private calendar, directed his staff to scrub anything that could be deemed controversial from that public calendar, and yet still went to the meetings. He didn't want any bad publicity from this. Well, guess what? As Ted Lieu tweeted out the day that this story broke, concealing or falsifying federal records is a felony. Scott Pruitt's behavior has gone from the comically incompetent in terms of looking for a used Trump mattress, and hand lotion, and gloves, and all kinds of crap, to dangerously criminal, because this is criminal behavior. CNN did some digging. They found that Scott Pruitt's travel records actually corroborate the whistleblower's story. While they can't pinpoint that he actually was at a specific meeting with some of the people, they can verify that he was in the same place at the same time and it did not match what was on his public calendar. They did also find, and I have to mention this because it's humorous, they did find that a couple of the meetings that were scrubbed from the official calendar were pretty innocuous. For example, one meeting he attended, which was not on his public calendar but was on his private one, was a lunch with Kellyanne Conway. I have to fully admit here, I don't blame Scott Pruitt for that. Now, if I had to have a meal with Kellyanne Conway, I sure as hell would not want anyone in the world to know about it. So, I'm going to give you a pass on that because I'm sure that was a horrible, horrifying experience for you there, Mr. Pruitt. But that aside, you are obviously a criminal and you need to be put in jail. That's the point we're at, folks. Scott Pruitt does not need to be serving as the protector of the environment for the United States. He needs to be in a jail cell surrounded by fellow criminals because that is what he is. He is breaking the law left and right, and nobody is doing a damn thing about it. Nobody. Where are the Republicans on this? Where are the drain the swamp dumb asses in this country? Donald Trump picked the worst person that I have ever seen in my life serving in federal government. Scott Pruitt takes it all. Yet, those idiots out there are still saying, "He's draining the swamp.
Views: 10253 The Ring of Fire
When Does Lobbying Become Bribery?
 
02:58
What is Sharia Law? http://testu.be/1Bu78Yj » Subscribe to NowThis World: http://go.nowth.is/World_Subscribe The Gambia declared itself as a type of Islamic state, but it's not to be confused with the Islamic State. So what is the difference? Learn More: The Gambia now an Islamic republic, says President Yahya Jammeh http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/12/gambia-now-an-islamic-republic-says-president-yahya-jammeh "The Gambia has been declared an Islamic republic by President Yahya Jammeh who said he wanted to further distance the west African state from its colonial past." Iran 1979: A revolution that shook the world http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/01/iran-1979-revolution-shook-world-2014121134227652609.html "The Middle East and North Africa continue to roil in the aftermath of popular uprisings - revolutions that continue to shape Libya, Tunisia and Egypt after the fall of the strongmen running the show." Afghanistan: Branches of Government http://www.afghan-web.com/politics/government.html "Afghanistan is an Islamic Republic. Afghanistan's constitution separates the government into three branches - a powerful executive, legislative and judicial. " Female government workers in the Gambia told to wear headscarves http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/05/gambia-female-government-workers-headscarves-islamic-republic "The Gambia has ordered female government employees to wear headscarves at work in a sign that the west African country is embracing a Muslim identity, one month after its president, Yahya Jammeh, declared it an Islamic republic." Music Track Courtesy of APM Music: _________________________ NowThis World is dedicated to bringing you topical explainers about the world around you. Each week we’ll be exploring current stories in international news, by examining the facts, providing historical context, and outlining the key players involved. We’ll also highlight powerful countries, ideologies, influential leaders, and ongoing global conflicts that are shaping the current landscape of the international community across the globe today. More from NowThis: » Tweet @NowThisNews on Twitter: http://go.nowth.is/News_Twitter » Subscribe to NowThis News: http://go.nowth.is/News_Subscribe » Like NowThis World on Facebook: https://go.nowth.is/World_Facebook » Connect with Judah: Follow @judah_robinson on Twitter – Facebook: http://go.nowth.is/LikeJudah » Connect with Versha: Follow @versharma on Twitter – Facebook: http://go.nowth.is/LikeVersha http://www.youtube.com/nowthisworld Special thanks to Lissette Padilla for hosting TestTube! Check Lissette out on Twitter:https://twitter.com/lizzette
Views: 83986 NowThis World
CCFR Radio Episode 32 - Jan 31, 2019
 
49:20
CCFR update with Rod and Tracey Wilson. CBC corruption, meeting with victims, Shot Show recap. Podcast Link: https://podcast.ccfr.ca/ Partial list of CBC firearm-related stories for 2018 only: November 13, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/coalition-for-gun-control-trigger-change-1.4904160 November 13, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/listen/shows/here-and-now-toronto/segment/15631814 October 25, 2018 - Heidi Rathjen, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/gun-control-groups-question-federal-commitment-1.4877752 Sept 14, 2018 - Tracey Wilson, prefaced by a list of shootings https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thesundayedition/the-sunday-edition-september-16-2018-1.4822353/a-canadian-gun-rights-lobbyist-says-banning-firearms-won-t-stop-gun-violence-1.4822643 September 20, 2018 - Response show specifically against Tracey Wilson's interview https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1326261315826 Sept 28, 2018 - Fair article, tells the story of issues with C71, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/karen-ludwig-gun-control-reforms-1.4842639 March 20, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/listen/shows/calgary-eyeopener/segment/15529668 March 26, 2018 - Unopposed including finding a gun owner who will agree https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/yukon-federal-gun-law-1.4591366 March 21, 2018 - Heidi Rathjen, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-gun-control-ottawa-1.4585087 April 4, 2018 - Ryan Slingerland, pro-gun, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/coalhurst-high-school-student-petition-bill-c71-1.4605704 Nov 13, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/coalition-for-gun-control-trigger-change-1.4904160 Nov 20, 2018 - Andrew Scheer, against C-71, multiple opposed comments https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/andrew-scheer-pushes-lifetime-firearms-ban-for-criminals-calls-liberal-policies-lazy-1.4913638 July 23, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/listen/shows/here-and-now-toronto/segment/15560139 July 24, 2018 - Jooyoung Lee, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/guns-domestic-danforth-shooting-toronto-1.4759159 August 29, 2018 - Jooyoung Lee, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/illegal-handgun-gun-hamilton-1.4803477 August 21, 2018 - Pro gun control, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/gun-violence-canada-1.4792765 June 19th, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1259355715910 June 19, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-june-19-2018-1.4711999/increase-in-toronto-shootings-will-continue-without-new-strategy-argues-anti-gun-advocate-1.4712013 July 12, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1275523651530 May 22, 2018 - Heide Rathjen, unopposed March 20, 2018 - Wendy Cukier, unopposed https://www.cbc.ca/listen/shows/calgary-eyeopener/segment/15529668 March 20, 2018 - Balanced https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-firearms-bill-c71-1.4584074 March 19, 2018 - Demonstration on what a balanced piece looks like https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/firearms-sales-recording-gun-control-debate-1.4580371 April 10, 2018 - Wayne Easter, making the case for gun control, no opposed view https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-guns-changes-laws-wayne-easter-mp-bill-c-71-1.4612813 April 6, 2018 - Anti gun control article given equal coverage to opposing view https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-firearm-laws-introduced-federal-government-1.4607794 May 25, 2017 - Another balanced article, though it seems the anti gun side always gets the last word. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/guns-firearms-restricted-canada-1.4129994 August 28, 2018 - Reasonably balanced, again anti gun given the last word https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-handguns-firears-1.4801700 August 10, 2018 - Balanced, fact-based last word https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/gun-crime-statistics-1.4779702 July 5, 2018 - Long article with 1500 words total, 91 words from the opposing side https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-gun-bill-gang-crime-1.4733374 Jan 21, 2018 - 1732 words total, 109 words opposing https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatoon/gun-license-suicide-mental-health-1.4493326
Views: 1660 CCFR Channel
Consultants and Lobbyists Lead the Way: APCW Perspectives Weekly for May 31st, 2013
 
06:40
This week J Todd discusses the new consultant hired by the state of New Jersey to help with regulations for their online gambling business. Also, who is really to blame for the failure of federal online gambling legislation in the U.S.?
Views: 4150 APCW Perspectives
How Trade Officials Got Rich as Foreign Lobbyists: Money and U.S. Finance (1990)
 
54:31
In politics, the "revolving door" is a movement of personnel between roles as legislators and regulators and the industries affected by the legislation and regulation. In some cases the roles are performed in sequence but in certain circumstances may be performed at the same time. Political analysts claim that an unhealthy relationship can develop between the private sector and government, based on the granting of reciprocated privileges to the detriment of the nation and can lead to regulatory capture. "Under current law, government officials who make contracting decisions must either wait a year before joining a military contractor or, if they want to switch immediately, must start in an affiliate or division unrelated to their government work. One big loophole is that these restrictions do not apply to many high-level policy makers..., who can join corporations or their boards without waiting." Examples of individuals who have moved between roles in this way in sensitive areas include Dick Cheney (military contracting),[19] Linda Fisher (pesticide and biotech), Philip Perry (homeland security), Pat Toomey,[20] Dan Coats,[21] and former FCC commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker[22][23] (media lobbying). High-profile U.S. Representative Democratic Dick Gephardt left his congressional post to become a lobbyist and his lobbying agency Gephardt Government Affairs Group earned close to $7 million in revenues in 2010 from clients including Goldman Sachs, Boeing, Visa Inc., Ameren Corporation, and Waste Management Inc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolving_door_%28politics%29 Before the mid 1970s, it was rare that a congressperson upon retirement would work for a lobbying firm and when it did occasionally happen, it "made eyebrows rise".[19] Prior to the 1980s lawmakers rarely became lobbyists as the profession was generally considered 'tainted' and 'unworthy' for once-elected officials such as themselves; in addition lobbying firms and trade groups were leery of hiring former members of Congress because they were reputed to be 'lazy as lobbyists and unwilling to ask former colleagues for favors'. By 2007, there were 200 former members of the House and Senate were registered lobbyists.[19] New higher salaries for lobbyists, increasing demand and a greater turnover in Congress and a 1994 change in the control of the House contributed to a change in attitude about the appropriateness of former elected officials becoming lobbyists. The revolving door became an established arrangement. In the new world of Washington politics, the activities of public relations and advertising mixed with lobbying and lawmaking. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_lobbying_in_the_United_States trade group representing Hedge Funds spent more than $1 million in one quarter trying to influence the government about financial regulations, including an effort to try to change a rule that might demand greater disclosure requirements for funds.[12] Amazon.com spent $450,000 in one quarter lobbying about a possible online sales tax as well as rules about data protection and privacy.[39] Corporations which sell substantially to the government tend to be active lobbiers. For example, aircraft manufacturer Boeing, which has sizeable defense contracts, pours "millions into lobbying":[40] Boeing Co. is one of the most influential companies in airline manufacturing and has continually shown its influence in lobbying Congress ... Between January and September, Boeing spent a total of $12 million lobbying according to research by the Center for Responsive Politics. Additionally, Boeing has its own political action committee, which donated more than $2.2 million to federal candidates during the 2010 election cycle. Of that sum, 53 percent went to Democrats. ...Through September, Boeing's PAC has donated $748,000 to federal politicians. —Chicago Sun-Times quoting OpenSecrets.org, 2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying_in_the_United_States
Views: 155 Way Back
CEOs And Lobbyists Spend Millions To Get Access To Trump
 
04:00
Trump’s constant golf outings aren’t just a distraction from work, they are also a great way for people with business before the government to get access to the President. According to a new report, CEOs and lobbyists have spent millions of dollars (money that goes right back to Donald Trump) to become members of his golf resorts, where they lie in wait for the President to arrive so they can “accidentally” get access to him. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins explains why this is so dangerous.   Link - https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/06/trump-gets-millions-from-golf-members-ceos-and-lobbyists-get-access-to-president.html Ring of Fire needs your help! Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: https://www.patreon.com/TheRingofFire Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content! Donald Trump may be known as a real estate mogul, but every year he's pulling in about $600 million from his golf resorts all around the world. 2015 and 2016, both years, he made about 600 million a piece from all of those golf resorts. Donald Trump obviously since becoming US president has spent one out of every three days at one of his own golf courses just trying to relax, and it's not just that the media noticed. It's not just that the American public is getting annoyed with it, and it's not just that those golf trips have bankrupted the Secret Service. Other people in this country too were starting to pay attention, specifically corporate CEOs with business in front of the government and corporate lobbyists. They understood that if you want to get access to Donald Trump, why not just become a member of his golf clubs? For the last two years, these two groups, lobbyists and corporate CEOs, have been paying millions of dollars a year to become members of these golf resorts because they know that that is the best place they can go if they want unfettered access to the president of the United States. This is all according to a brand new report from USA Today that went through and found 4,500 different people registered with these golf clubs, made contact with them to find out if they have business in front of the federal government, whether they're seeking government contracts or whatever, and a lot of them said yes. A lot of them actually happened to be defense contractors. One of them happens to be a lawyer who's representing Saudi Arabia against an onslaught of terrorism-related lawsuits trying to protect that country and screw over Americans who've been the victims of terror or whose family members were the victims of terrorist attacks here in the United States. Those are the kinds of people who are literally hanging around Donald Trump's golf clubs just to get a few minutes with the president to get in his ear for a few seconds, and say, "Hey, while we're here, let me talk to you about this." It's true that in the past other people, other groups, other presidents have done this with politicians, but the fact that these people are already paying millions of dollars to become exclusive members to Donald Trump's golf resorts and that money is going back into Donald Trump's pocket, that's something that Trump knows, because not just are these people standing there waiting to talk to him. They've already given millions of dollars to be a part of this golf resort. Trump understands that. It's essentially lobbying, you know, campaign donations going under the table, because you're buying a seat at the table where you know Donald Trump's going to come eat eventually. There's nothing technically illegal about it, but it is absolutely disgusting, especially coming from a president who promised us to drain the swamp. He didn't drain anything. All he did was spread the swamp out, because now we've got swampy Mar-a-Lago, his swampy golf course in Virginia, and the swampy one up in New Jersey, so that swamp has extended beyond the White House, as Trump originally told us, and it's now coast to coast, because all you have to have are a few million dollars in your pocket and a little bit of time to kill, but if you play your cards right and pay attention to social media and where the president's going to be, you too could have complete access to the president of the United States, able to tell him anything you want to tell him, as long as you've got the money to be a member of his very exclusive resorts.
Views: 9286 The Ring of Fire
Cybersecurity Lobbying Booming: How Law Firms Can Profit
 
06:36
April 5 (Bloomberg Law) -- In recent months, a wave of lawyers and consultants have taken to lobbying various members of the federal government on cybersecurity issues. David Ransom, partner at McDermott Will & Emery, talks with Bloomberg Law's Lee Pacchia about how a wide range of industries are concerned about the potential effects of cybersecurity legislation on their respective businesses. "I really think that the reason you're seeing all these lobbying registrations on this issue is just the breadth of the industries affected," he says.
Views: 324 Bloomberg Law
The New System: Money and Influence in American Politics
 
05:51
In school we're all taught the process through which legislation should be made. But in a post Citizens United world, the system is fundamentally different. It's time we decide to either fix our textbooks or fix corruption. Stay tuned for more from Watch.Ed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TRANSCRIPT: If you’ve ever taken a civics class, you probably have some idea how laws in the United States are made. But the legislative process we’re all taught in school—the one laid out in our country’s Constitution—is pretty far removed from the reality of the legislative process today. “Questions? Yes.” “So, what about lobbyists?” The truth is, there’s a player involved in the making of laws with more influence than any of the three braches of the federal government and more persuasion the voice of the American people. That player, unsurprisingly, is money. Lesson 1 – The Cost of Getting to Congress If you breakdown the expenditures of Congressional campaign, you’ll see a bit of money goes towards office rent and utilities, a bit for staff payroll, some for phones and polling, and printing and mailing, but the largest piece of the pie by far goes toward media buys. And the more money a candidate can pump into this piece, the better—the more you’re seen and heard, the more likely you’ll be voted for. The trouble is, media airtime is expensive. It’s not surprising then, that the candidates with the most money usually win. Over the last decade or so, House candidates who outspent their opponents, won election more than 90% of the time on average. And the average cost for a House seat in the 2012 elections? $1.6M. A seat in the Senate cost more than 6 times that. At prices like those, congressional members depend heavily on campaign contributions if they hope to maintain their spot on the Hill. Lesson 2 – The Donors So, who has the money? Well, not a majority of America. In 2010, a tiny 0.26% of Americans funded about 68% of contributions to Congress. Most of the money that’s helping Congressmen win elections is coming from a select group of mega-donors, all of which have specific—and usually economic—interests. What makes this even more troubling is the fact that big donor groups, like Political Actions Committees, no longer have an obligation to disclose the source of political contributions, and so-called dark money spending has skyrocketed. This is thanks to the 2010 Citizens United case, where the Supreme Court of the United States decided it was unconstitutional to limit political spending by corporations, and allowed all contributions to be made anonymously. The Court reasoned that political spending is a form of political speech, and to limit it is to rob corporations of their first amendment rights. But of course, by following this line of logic the Supreme Court is essentially ensuring that those with the most money—that 0.26% of the population—have a louder voice in our government than the other 99.74% us. Lesson 3 – Why It Matters It’s rare that a congressman would side with donors over constituents if dealing with an issue that the public is outspoken about. However, a large majority of the legislation brought before Congress is not well publicized; bills dealing with corporate tax policy don’t often grab headlines. But these issues heavily dictate our national priorities, economics, and day-to-day life. Lobbying is the reason why corn syrup and other ingredients found in fast-food are subsidized 26 times more heavily than apples and other vegetables; it’s why big oil and gas companies receive subsidies while banking a quarter million dollars in profit every minute; why private lenders like Sallie Mae remain loosely regulated, and make huge profits off of student debt; and why despite comprehensive healthcare reform, it is still illegal for the government to negotiate drug prices. Lobbyists can be important in helping congressmen to understand and address prevalent issues. But they can’t meet with every interest group, and when the decision comes down to meeting with a campaign contributor or a non-contributor, well, the decision is not hard to make. The bottom line is that money gives interest groups and individuals access to lawmakers not given to the rest of us, and the rest of us are oftentimes not of much interest to those interest groups. Like we’re taught in civics class, you’re only supposed to need a mind, a voice, and a will to participate in American Politics. But increasingly, a big checkbook doesn’t hurt either.
Views: 7587 Watch. Ed.
Emboldened Cannabis Execs Deploy K Street Lobbyists For Weed Biz Reform
 
00:53
A bipartisan bill introduced last summer shows there is broad support for cannabis reform. In fact, Business Insider reports that now, cannabis startups are sending veteran lobbyists to Capitol Hill. They'll be in support of the STATES Act. It requires the feds to keep a hands-off approach on the decisions made by states on marijuana legalization. The bill was introduced last summer by Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Cory Gardner (R-CO). Even President Donald Trump even said he will "probably" end up supporting it. https://www.businessinsider.com/cannabis-retailers-are-sending-lobbyists-to-the-hill-for-bank-reform-2019-1 http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit Business using http://wochit.com
Views: 73 Wochit Business
Major Garrett reports on the Obama Administrations transparency and lobbyist regulations
 
01:45
Major Garrett reports on the Obama Administrations transparency and lobbyist regulations
Views: 182 Shaneskills
An amazing 8th grader takes down the US government and exposes lobbyists!
 
01:02
Citations Editors of encyclopedia Britannica. "Lobbying." Britannica, Aug.-Sept. 2017, p. 1, www.britannica.com/topic/lobbying. Accessed 7 Dec. 2017. Is Lobbying Good or Bad?" US represent us, 2017, p. 1, represent.us/action/ is-lobbying-good-or-bad/. Accessed 7 Dec. 2017. "e Which members of Congress become lobbyists? The ones with the most power. Here’s the data." Washington Post [Washington], 15 Jan. 2016, Politics sec., www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/01/15/ which-members-of-congress-become-lobbyists-the-ones-with-the-most-power-heres-the -data/?utm_term=.756398dddc69. Accessed 7 Dec. 2017. Script Today I am here to talk to you about lobbying, Lobbying is a huge issue in the US. Lobbying is the act of attempting to influence business and government leaders like congressmen to create legislation or conduct an activity that will help a particular company or interest group using money. What’s wrong with Lobbying? Well The US congress have become dependent on money from lobbyists to fund their political careers, Congressmen end up passing laws to keep the lobbyists and their clients happy, instead of laws that benefit the American people. in January 2006 a lobbyist called Jack Abramoff was sentenced to six years in federal prison for mail fraud, conspiracy to bribe public officials, and tax evasion. How can the american people stop lobbying? The American people can create petitions that enforces a rule saying that all work with lobbyists and their clients must be transparent. If many people signed this and was passed through media it would create influence help convince members of congress to create a bill that could possibly end up as a law. Then this law would stop lobbyists from doing things that negatively impact the people.
Views: 9 Henry Cattell
Vaping laws: Provinces need to butt out too
 
04:31
Holly Nicholas reports, CCF gave federal vaping legislation a failing grade in a recently released report but how did the provinces fare? Watch Holly's report to find out. MORE: http://www.therebel.media/vaping_laws_update_feds_guilty_of_overreach_but_provinces_need_to_butt_out_too Subscribe to the Rebel’s YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/c/RebelMediaTV PLUS http://www.Facebook.com/JoinTheRebel *** http://www.Twitter.com/TheRebelTV Part 1: CCF report aims to correct harmful vaping legislation http://www.therebel.media/canadian_constitution_foundation_report_aims_to_correct_harmful_vaping_legislation
Views: 13396 Rebel Media
Lobbying Reform
 
03:26:57
Lobbying Reform - House Committee on Rules - 191850-1-DVD - 2006-03-30 - The House Rules Committee held a hearing on the Lobbying Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006. Members testified about proposed changes to regulations governing fundraising and lobbying practices, financial disclosures, and the practice of earmarking legislation. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/191850-1
Views: 30 HouseResourceOrg
Finance: What are the Clayton Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act?
 
03:34
The Clayton Antitrust Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act are both about controlling monopolies. ...Trust us.
Views: 981 Shmoop
Bureaucracy Basics: Crash Course Government and Politics #15
 
06:59
This week Craig Benzine discuses bureaucracies. Bureaucracies tend to be associated with unintelligible rules and time-wasting procedures, but they play an important, though controversial, role in governing. From the FDA to the EPA, these agencies were established to help the government manage and carry out laws much more efficiently - to bring the rule making and enforcement closer to the experts. But the federal bureaucracy (which is part of the executive branch) has a lot of power and sometimes acts likes Congress in creating regulations and like the courts through administrative adjudications. It's all a bit problematic for that whole "separation of powers" thing. So we'll talk about that too, and the arguments for and against increased federal bureaucracy. Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org -- Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 685481 CrashCourse
Chronically Human Podcast Ep 003 - Jason Pye - Libertarian Lobbyist from Freedomworks
 
56:48
Today's episode we have a great conversation with Jason Pye, a Libertarian Lobbyist. We find out what it's like to be a Libertarian in Washington DC and about his work in getting the "First Step Act" passed. He gives a detailed analysis of "The First Step Act" which is a very important Criminal Justice Reform law, that everyone, no matter their political affiliation can get behind. It was signed into law by President Trump in December last year. He also gave great insight into how Criminal Justice Reform not only helps give long over due justice to those who were punished by insane sentencing laws of the past, but it also saves taxpayer money. It is truly a win-win for individuals and for society. We also discuss how far The Federal Government has strayed from the principles of Individual Liberty. We talk about some of the causes of why so many people are locked up in the United States. Right now there are 2.2 million individuals in jails and prisons plus another 1.5 million on probation. We briefly discuss the War on Drugs and how that has been used to target specific populations by the government and how it has helped to create the exponential growth of incarceration in this country, since 1971. The Movement to Audit the Fed, according to Jason is still alive and well in DC. We talk about the history of that bill, which Ron Paul first introduced, and about who is carrying on that important work to finally force the Federal Reserve to open its books. It was very interesting to hear from a DC insider, who is working everyday to advance the cause of Freedom. As a liberty minded individual, I just want to be left alone and not have to engage in the world of politics. But that's not the world we live in. Every year 18,000+ bills are submitted in Congress and that doesn't count the bills introduced at the state level. Many of those bills, that aren't the kind that are designed to rename a post office for example, are designed to limit your freedom and to take your money in taxes and give it to someone else. If people like Jason weren't there to present the case for Freedom, who would? Visit Freedomworks if you are interested in what they are doing. On their website they say they are "...over 6 million Americans who are passionate about promoting free markets and individual liberty. You can find out more about Jason's work at Freedomworks.com I also share my recent engagement with the political system, when I spoke in front of the Georgia Kratom Risk Study Committee. I found the elected officials to be receptive to hearing from the citizens. At the meeting they assured me that Georgia isn't going to ban Kratom. When the bills on Kratom come up for vote, I'll see if they were telling the truth or not. At Chronically Human we want to discuss and share the ideas that can help create a more just, free, peaceful and prosperous world for us all. If you like what we're doing here please share, like, comment and subscribe. If you want to support the show please like, comment, share and subscribe. Thanks for watching. Today's episode of The Chronically Human Podcast is brought to you by "Bitcoin not Banks" t-shirts. If you believe that Bitcoin is a better alternative to the existing banking system or know someone who does, contact me [email protected] to order your's today. Big thank you to Jason for his time and we hope to talk with him again soon. Thanks for watching.
Views: 66 Chronically Human
Trudeau found guilty of federal ethics violations
 
05:32
Comment below If you think Justin Trudeau should be criminally charged as he was found guilty of violating provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act. $48,966,065.00 tax dollars given to the Aga Khan by the Trudeau government. These are the best clips from a 2006 incident when Prime minister Trudeau went on a uncleared Christmas vacation to the island home of Aga Khan, who is a lobbyist. This incident found Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau guilty of violating the Ethics code, and is also considered to be a conflict of interest. Justin Trudeau, who came into office vowing to set the gold standard for transparency and ethical behavior, became the first prime minister found to have violated federal conflict of interest rules. Federal ethics commissioner Mary Dawson concluded Trudeau violated the rules when he vacationed Christmas 2016 at the private Bahamian island owned by the Aga Khan and when his wife and children vacationed on the same island months earlier in March 2016. Dawson found the Trudeau's visit to the island — and the prime minister hopping aboard the Aga Khan's private helicopter to get there — broke sections of the Conflict of Interest Act that prohibits a minister or any member of their family from accepting gifts or "advantages" that could reasonably be seen as influencing government decisions. Dawson also concluded that Trudeau didn't properly recuse himself on two occasions in May 2016 from private meetings about the Aga Khan and a $15-million grant to the billionaire philanthropist's endowment fund of the Global Center for Pluralism. Trudeau said he didn't believe the vacation would be an ethical concern because he'd been told — he didn't specify by whom — there was no issue since the Aga Khan, the spiritual leader of the world's Ismaili Muslims, is a friend. www.marvale.co/single-post/Gifts-Justin-Trudeau-and-his-family-have-received-Corporate-gifts-are-problematic
Views: 79548 MarVale News
Unbreaking America: A NEW Short Film about Solving the Corruption Crisis
 
12:37
Find out how you can get involved at http://represent.us Our government is broken, and we have to fix it. RepresentUs board member Jennifer Lawrence and Director of RepresentUs Josh Silver, walks through three lines that show what's wrong with legal corruption in our government, how we fix it and what you can do about it. Jennifer Lawrence will be at Unrig Summit 2019 in Nashville March 29-31. Register now at http://www.UnrigSummit.com Sources for video: https://act.represent.us/sign/Unbreaking-America-Sources/ Credits: Unbreaking America Jennifer Lawrence Josh Silver Director MJ Delaney Written By Josh Silver Joshua Graham Lynn Jennifer Lawrence Animation Sachio Cook & Niko Guardia http://TodoTodo.tv Producer Ryan Kleier Drew Levin Carrie MacFadden Executive Producer Joshua Graham Lynn Director of Photography Drew Levin Editor Ryan Kleier Camera/Grip Derek Sexton-Horani Camera Operator Nikita Carpenter Assistant Camera Jennifer Hart Gardner Gaffer Josh Fordham Grip Theodore Johnson Sound Gio Lima Production Assistant Paris Peterson Teleprompter Lou Blackman Filmed at BE Electric Studios Art & Concepting Adom Balcom Sound Design Hobo Audio, Inc Original Music By Garth Stevenson Colorist Zachary Gobetz Hair Rebekah Forecast Makeup Kate Synnott Assistant to Ms. Lawrence Meghan Grimm
Views: 671474 RepresentUs
The Role of Regulations in Business and Politics
 
08:48
The Role of Regulation in Business and Politics There are many ways that rules can be made. Congress can pass something up to the Executive Branch An Independent Commission try to use rule-making through the office of regulatory affairs, they can impose a rule, make public comment, final rules, codes of regulations, Executive Branch can propose rules directly to executive agencies and while all that is going on the Federal Courts need to review everything to ensure it is not going to violate the constitution Rule-making is the process where regulatory agencies promote some sort of a rule to have the force of law. Rule is some sort of a decree issued by an agency to implement a law that is passed by Congress The process of rule-making is designed to protect the public from arbitrary and unfair acts of government. Federal Register, when an agency decides to promote or pass a rule it has to go through research deliberation and consultation with effective parties, particularly the Electorate, at least in theory that is, when a draft is ready the agency publishes the rule in the Federal Register, the Federal Register is a daily publication that contains all the proposed rules, final rules, notices of public meeting about regulatory agency and presidential orders, pages in the Federal Register are used a crude gage of regulatory activity, in the Federal Register the public can comment on any proposed rules, however they cannot block the rules, after final publication in the Federal Register, final rules are codified in the Code of Federal Regulations. Code of Federal Regulations, is reference work that compiles the work of all agencies in a series of volumes, In both the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations, the amount of pages that has been added to them has been expanding dramatically over the past 100 years The problem is, if you understand everything in a regulation, or had read every single regulation, trying to figure out how to comply with regulations would be difficult if not impossible, the reason is… a regulation just says what an end state should be, you have complied when your process at the end of the day looks like this, but you have absolutely no clue how to get there, what they have done in response to this is develop a formal guidance with the regulations Guidance, is typically non-binding documents that are designed to clarify regulations. So if you have no idea what the regulation means, and I hve no idea how to comply with the regulation, you can look at guidance and it will state that these are some of the nest practices that come from the regulations, that we as federal agents have seen from industry or corporations that comply with federal regulation in this matter, you can always contact the agency that puts out the regulation and ask what are you supposed to do, they would rather you call and get things straight than try and fix things later, Presidential Oversight, presidents have always tried to control the bureaucratic machine but have always been met with resistance and have had little success. They do have some tools at their disposal to control the amount of regulation such as Executive Orders Moritoriums – no more additions to the regulations Appoint Heads of Agencies who are more-friendly to the Presidents’ Agenda and would be less inclined to do more regulations Cut the Budget of agencies that are increasing regulations Central Review of the regulations at the White House Congress must approve Presidential Nominees of Agency Heads Congress can make appropriations or control the purse strings of different agencies if they feel they are over regulated Conflicts of Agencies Can be resolved in numerous ways Administrative Procedure Act which requires agencies to set up an judication process leading to a trial before an Administrative Law Judge, if a Judges’ decision fails to resolve the dispute Federal Courts can review agency actions. When there is conflicts between the people and an agency you can resolve through the courts or if it a conflict between agencies then that also can be resolved through the courts Chevron Doctrine, basically states that Federal Courts should defer to agency rules and these agency rules should be based on a reasonable common sense interpretation of the ambiguous statute, and of course, common sense is anything but common when it comes to government, Congress has allowed federal courts to hold unlawful any agency action deemed as arbitrary or unfair, unconstitutional, in excess of agency jurisdiction, or unsupported by any sort of evidence. So the Chevron Doctrine basically forces an agency to use some sort of common sense. The cost of regulations, can be broken down into total dollar cost and also the cost of administering the regulatory process, other costs of regulation are also large but they get a little bit more difficult to quantify
Views: 198 Dr. D University
UK Ban on Encryption explained - protecting children by banning their privacy
 
11:21
UK wants to ban encryption. Privacy is for criminals and bad people. Encryption is bad. The British government wants to ban WhatsApp from using end-to-end encryption. Join me to debate the state of surveillance and privacy in the United Kingdom. The government of the United Kingdom seeks to implement backdoor into encryption, that is break encryption completely, to allow unlimited access to the contents of people's messages. This tactic has proven to provide little help to catch real criminals. Rather the mere capability presents the threat to our freedom and privacy. End-to-end encryption is important to protect your information and online privacy. Without it anybody can read your messages without even hacking your accounts. With this kind of approach to cyber security, it’s only a matter of years before Equifax breaches will happen to all kinds of data collecting programs. And soon it will be in the news that all of your whatsapp, Facebook, and Gmail messages are available to read and search by your real name for free leaked somewhere on the Internet. It will be too late then for the outrage of embarrassed spouses, fired employees, ruined relationships, jeopardized business deals, destroyed careers, doxxed activists, and depressed kids having their mistakes public in front of everyone. Read this article: https://techcrunch.com/2017/10/04/uk-gives-whatsapp-another-spanking-over-e2e-crypto/ Featured https://thehackernews.com/2014/05/ex-nsa-director-admits-we-kill-people.html https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/29/uk-government-encryption-whatsapp-investigatory-powers-act https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-security-whatsapp/uk-says-whatsapp-lets-paedophiles-and-gangsters-operate-beyond-the-law-idUSKCN1C8165?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtechnologyNews+%28Reuters+Technology+News%29 https://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/oct/11/pornography-internet-service-providers https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/google-and-facebook-lobbyists-try-to-stop-new-online-privacy-protections/? https://www.salon.com/2007/06/01/intel_contractors/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/06/AR2006050601088.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11764958/Porn-sites-accessed-20000-times-a-month-on-parliament-computers.html https://www.rt.com/uk/310857-parliament-porn-sites-access/ https://www.techrepublic.com/article/dhs-orders-federal-agencies-to-bolster-cybersecurity-with-https-email-authentication/ https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/26/intelligence-services-access-whatsapp-amber-rudd-westminster-attack-encrypted-messaging https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/19/extreme-surveillance-becomes-uk-law-with-barely-a-whimper Recommended https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2017/01/22/whatsapp-facebook-backdoor-government-data-request/#b3b603c1030c Follow me: https://twitter.com/The_HatedOne_ https://www.bitchute.com/TheHatedOne/ https://www.reddit.com/user/The_HatedOne/ https://www.minds.com/The_HatedOne The footage and images featured in the video were for critical analysis, commentary and parody, which are protected under the Fair Use laws of the United States Copyright act of 1976.
Views: 4948 The Hated One
NRA chief lobbyist on NFA legislation, diversifying the NRA, plans for 2014
 
04:41
Chris Cox, chief lobbyist for the National Rifle Association, discusses NFA legislation, diversifying the NRA's membership, and the gun lobby's strategy for 2014 at the NRA's annual convention in Indianapolis. For more information check out http://www.guns.com
Views: 1805 Gunscom
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Corruption Is Legal In The United States
 
05:07
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Corruption Is Legal In The United States THANK YOU CHAIR. LET'S PLAY A GAME AND SAY A LIGHTNING ROUND GAME. I WILL BE THE BAD GUY WHICH I'M SURE HALF THE ROOM WOULD AGREE WITH ANYWAY AND I WANT TO GET AWAY WITH AS MUCH BAD THINGS AS POSSIBLE IDEALLY TO ENRICH MYSELF AND ADVANCE MY INTEREST PUTTING MYSELF AHEAD OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. I ALSO ENLISTED ALL OF YOU AS MY CO-CONSPIRATORS SO YOU WILL HELP ME LEGALLY GET AWAY WITH THIS. SO I WANT TO RUN IF I WANT TO RUN A CAMPAIGN THAT IS ENTIRELY FUNDED BY CORPORATE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES CAN ANYTHING PREVENT ME FROM DOING THAT? NO. SO NOTHING STOPS ME FROM BEING ENTIRELY FUNDED BY CORPORATE PACKS WITH THE FUEL INDUSTRY OR HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY I AM ENTIRE 100 PERCENT FUNDED. OKAY. IF I HAVE A REALLY, REALLY BAD GUY AND THERE ARE SKELETONS IN MY CLOSET THAT I NEED TO COVER UP SO I DON'T GET ARRESTED IS IT TRUE MISTER SMITH YOU WROTE THIS OPINION PIECE FOR "THE WASHINGTON POST" ENTITLED THESE PAYMENTS TO WOMEN WERE IN ON SEEMING LEAVE IT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY WERE ILLEGAL. I ASSUME THAT'S RIGHT. SO WITH HUSH MONEY I CAN DO ALL SORTS OF TOTAL TERRIBLE THINGS IS TOTALLY LEGAL AND THAT IS CONSIDERED SPEECH. THAT MONEY IS CONSIDERED SPEECH AND TO PAY OFF THOSE THAT I NEED TO PAY OFF SO NOW I'M ELECTED I AM IN I HAVE THE POWER TO SHAPE THE LAWS THAT GOVERN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. FABULOUS. IS THERE ANY HARD LIMIT THAT I HAVE FOR WHAT LEGISLATION I'M ALLOWED TO TOUCH ANY LIMITS ON THE LAWS I COULD WRITE TO FINANCE MY CAMPAIGN QUICK. THERE IS NONE. TO BE TOTALLY FUNDED BY BIG PHARMA. THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY. NOW THE LAST THING I WANT TO DO WITH AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE IS ANYTHING PREVENTING ME FROM HOLDING STOCKS IN AN OIL OR GAS COMPANY AND THEN TO REGULATE THAT INDUSTRY TO POTENTIALLY CAUSE THE STOCK VALUE AND TO PUT - - ACCRUE A LOT OF MONEY IN THAT TIME QUICK. YOU COULD DO THAT. I COULD DO THAT NOW WITH OUR CURRENT LAWS THE WAY THEY ARE SET UP? . YES. GREAT. MY LAST QUESTION IS IT POSSIBLE THAT ANY ELEMENT OF THIS APPLIES TO THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT AND CURRENT PUBLIC SERVANTS RIGHT NOW. YES. SO WE HAVE A SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALLY BROKEN WE HAVE THOSE EXISTING IN THE BODY WHICH MEANS THEY ARE HERE SHAPING THE QUESTIONS THAT ARE BEING ASKED OF YOU RIGHT NOW. IS THAT CORRECT? YES. ALL RIGHT. IN RELATION TO CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT COMPARED TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WORD YOU SAY CONGRESS HAS THE SAME SORT OF STANDARD OF ACCOUNTABILITY? WORD YOU SAY THAT'S ABOUT EVEN OR ON THE FEDERAL SIDE? IN TERMS OF LAWS APPLYING TO THE PRESIDENT? THERE ALMOST NINE. SO BEING HELD TO A HIGHER ETHICAL STANDARD THAN THE President Of The UNITED STATES. THAT'S RIGHT THERE ARE SOME RULES THAT APPLY. SO FOR ME TO BE A PRETTY BAD GUY IT'S EVEN EASIER FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES I WOULD ASSUME. THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
Views: 25069 Bernie Banner
Game of Loans - Four Corners
 
46:12
30 March 2015 Four Corners reporter Stephen Long exposes the highly questionable business practices of so called 'payday' lenders. Payday lending is now a major business with some companies listed on the stock exchange. The industry defends itself, claiming it provides a service the banks aren't interested in delivering. "There are 10 million Australians that don't have access to a credit card. Where are they going to get credit?" - Payday Lending Company CEO But as Long tests this claim he uncovers a trail of misery, meeting people like Anna. A hard working mother of three, she took a short-term loan from a payday lender to buy her daughter's school computer. Borrowing the money was easy, too easy, and before long she borrowed more money, sinking ever deeper into debt. Anna had discovered what thousands of other short-term borrowers already knew; the system encourages dependency and the windfall profits come not from any one loan but by sucking people into multiple loans, sometimes with effective interest rates of more than 300 percent. "The whole business model relies on trapping people in debt. You get the first loan and you get the second loan and you get the third loan to pay off the second loan." - Financial Advisor. The questionable practices don't end there. Reporter Stephen Long spoke to industry insiders who confirmed that lenders provided credit to heroin addicts, doling out loans at one end of the shop after the addicted person had pawned goods at the front desk. In another case, a man suffering a brain injury was signed up to multiple loans even though he didn't understand the documents he was signing. In 2013 the Federal Government tried to rein in the worst excesses of the industry with new legislation. After an intensive industry lobbying campaign the laws were watered down but still capped interest and establishment fees. Despite this, a recent survey by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reveals that two thirds of payday lenders were highly likely to breach credit laws relating to responsible lending. Some gave loans to people already in default while more than half issued loans to customers who already had multiple loans. All the evidence suggests the industry is now expanding massively online. Will the authorities and Government act to control the industry mavericks?
Views: 119516 Australian Perspective.
Lobbying in the US and what's wrong with it explained
 
01:02
Citations Editors of encyclopedia Britannica. "Lobbying." Britannica, Aug.-Sept. 2017, p. 1, www.britannica.com/topic/lobbying. Accessed 7 Dec. 2017. Is Lobbying Good or Bad?" US represent us, 2017, p. 1, represent.us/action/ is-lobbying-good-or-bad/. Accessed 7 Dec. 2017. "e Which members of Congress become lobbyists? The ones with the most power. Here’s the data." Washington Post [Washington], 15 Jan. 2016, Politics sec., www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/01/15/ which-members-of-congress-become-lobbyists-the-ones-with-the-most-power-heres-the -data/?utm_term=.756398dddc69. Accessed 7 Dec. 2017. Script: Today I am here to talk to you about lobbying, Lobbying is a huge issue in the US. Lobbying is the act of attempting to influence business and government leaders like congressmen to create legislation or conduct an activity that will help a particular company or interest group using money. What’s wrong with Lobbying? Well The US congress have become dependent on money from lobbyists to fund their political careers, Congressmen end up passing laws to keep the lobbyists and their clients happy, instead of laws that benefit the American people.Lobbyist may take congressmen to nice places to help convince them.. in January 2006 a lobbyist called Jack Abramoff was sentenced to six years in federal prison for mail fraud, conspiracy to bribe public officials, and tax evasion. How can the american people stop lobbying? The american people can create a petition that forces lobbyists work to be transparent. If enough people overwhelm the government then the congress are going to have to do something to benefit the people and stop them from complaining.
Views: 22 Henry Cattell